Saturday, 4 March 2017

Animus sculptural centerpiece



Amidst the endless corridors of 18th and 19th century silver ware lies a small cabinet of ‘contemporary British silversmiths’ work, aimed at celebrating what is considered to now be a niche and specialist skill. The Animus is a 2015 one off piece, made through sterling silver forming. Kevin Gray, the creator of the work is somewhat of a black horse however, his creative process is that of a strange one it seems, as ‘he thinks through his work continuously, but makes no drawings beforehand.’ This way of working struck me most as an individual means of producing and lead me to wonder why this work was chosen to be shown by the curator, Corinne Julius.


As I looked into the work further I began to discover that the process of production was almost as nebular as the thought process behind the work itself, Gray uses the industry standard of TIG welding, as opposed to the traditional method of silver soldering it seems. It was unclear as to why at first, but it could be speculated that perhaps by using the most common and widely used method for mass production the artist is highlighting the quality of work that can be produced in great quantities, yet evidently is not amongst the almost slave labour like production lines of the modern day capitalist society we dwell within. This ‘fractured and tormented process’ is not without struggle however, as the Label for the work describes that the artist does in fact face much hardship and ‘complex technical issues’ whilst working in this way.
However, in contrast to the idea that Kevin Gray may be in fact subverting the norm of a capitalist society, it is not irrational to query the fact that this is a one-off ‘centre piece’, an object of furniture, a one-off possession only available to the rich and fortunate. Thus I must ask what is it that the V&A are trying to show through this collection of work. Evidently silver-smithing is without a doubt an incredibly niche and dying art form in the modern day society, yet what is that exhibiting this work does then, besides document the past and show the present. Where is the push towards the future of a delicate and beautiful art form? What is it that the curator is telling or highlighting to us about this work as we continually move forward into a evidently capitalist future?


To me this skilled and beautiful art form is one that has been over taken and outdone by the quantity and mass scale of industrial production, yet there was no reference to this within the exhibit, no point in which I considered what happens when this quality of work is inevitably run into the dust. All that is left is the rich, keeping their prized silverware in a padlocked, airtight cupboard and the museums boxing up a metric tonne of silver ware into some container of some warehouse never to be seen again.

Thursday, 19 January 2017

Observing the everyday


The act of taking a shower is, for many of us in the 1st world, a daily ritual. Thus the need for good product design and concise use of anthropometric and ergonomic data is that of a vital one. The first area in which good design can be seen within the shower environment is when looking at the way the water is drained, slightly angled flooring is a very common means in which this is done. This, alongside grooved or patterned flooring which is often seen in moulded shower basins allows water to flow away with ease (whilst also offering friction to help remove the risk of slipping when the basin is wet).
Next the factor of how a single shower system can be designed to suit the mass majority must be addressed, the vast majority seem to choose the simplest option, adjustability. This is most noticeable when looking at the shower head, through using grips the height and pitch of the shower head can be modified with ease in order to suit most all users.
In addition to this, the heat and strength of water flow can also be adjusted, this is a hugely important and necessary factor on any modern shower system as it allows the user to have control over the experience. By doing this you offer variety in its use, another example of where this takes place is when looking at the variety of shower heads on the market, many now offer different settings in how the water is designed to be released (e.g. Jet, light shower or a mix of both.)
Another factor of the design is the way in which the water is stored inside the unit, rubber seals are used on joints to contain water within the system itself whilst a hose, encased in metal ring tubing to strengthen the tubing and help insulate the water runs from the control/feed unit to the shower head. All these pieces are designed to be fitted together with threaded locks in order to allow for it to be taken apart for easy repairs and replacement of parts without the need of a specialist.
All these factors make for a very reliable and thought out system, however there are also some bad aspects to the act of taking a shower. Due to the constant daily use, often lime scale begins to fester in the rubber holes of the shower head, thus stopping the water flow or causing the water to fire out at an angle as opposed to straight down to the floor. Also in the case of a family house hold, often the water boiler cannot keep up with the rate of use and thus the latter people tend to not experience the same temperature as those going first. Both these factors are issues that could be rectified with some design innovation however, I feel that it is necessary to point out that these factors are not the fault of the shower unit, but rather external factors that cause implications on the experience at hand.

Link to image used: https://www.tritonshowers.co.uk/media/catalog/product/cache/4/image/1230x1230/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/m/i/mixer-shower-thames-mini-sequential-exposed-list.jpg

Thursday, 13 October 2016